Seems that way. On Feb 11, 2014 12:19 PM, "R Paxton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whoa, hold on now. What about the Yi Nanonote, is that now considered > vaporware? > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Mark Tuson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have been thinking this for a couple of years now. My NanoNote died a >> while back, and I was philosophical about it; I thought we were going to >> get upgraded devices from time to time. Now if it's all in the past... >> that's just wrong. >> On 11 Feb 2014 10:14, "Christoph Pulster" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ... thanks to Sharism, which did an aweful job cooperation with the >>> resellers. I am really deeply disappointed. >>> There is a ready to sell product, there is also customer demand (small, >>> but anyway), and Sharism is ignoring the market. >>> I have 3 units left in stock, after this the Nanonote is past. >>> >>> Christoph >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qi Hardware Discussion List >>> Mail to list (members only): [email protected] >>> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: >>> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qi Hardware Discussion List >> Mail to list (members only): [email protected] >> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qi Hardware Discussion List > Mail to list (members only): [email protected] > Subscribe or Unsubscribe: > http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
