My mistake. It is "Ya."
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Mark Tuson <[email protected]> wrote: > Who's even in charge of producing them? It seems to me that we were all > wish-listing on the next iterations of it but they weren't being made by > the community. This is where the Pandora got it right. > > Also, when did the Ya's name get changed to Yi? I must have missed that > one. > > > > On 11/02/2014 19:50, Paul Boddie wrote: > >> On Tuesday 11. February 2014 19.37.53 Mark Tuson wrote: >> >>> Ya Nanonote was due out two years ago, if memory serves. >>> It is *definitely* vapourware. >>> >> Well, there was the AVT2 [*] which was the continuation version of the Ben >> with more features, and that could have been the Yi, but I guess the >> viability >> of production wasn't demonstrated and so the project was put on hold >> indefinitely. Werner could presumably tell us a bit about that; from what >> he >> has said in the past, I think he even has one of those. >> >> Paul >> >> [*] http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/AVT2_RC2_Reference_Board >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qi Hardware Discussion List >> Mail to list (members only): [email protected] >> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware. >> com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qi Hardware Discussion List > Mail to list (members only): [email protected] > Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware. > com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
