Ya Nanonote was due out two years ago, if memory serves.
It is *definitely* vapourware.


On 11/02/2014 17:19, R Paxton wrote:
Whoa, hold on now. What about the Yi Nanonote, is that now considered vaporware?


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Mark Tuson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I have been thinking this for a couple of years now. My NanoNote
    died a while back, and I was philosophical about it; I thought we
    were going to get upgraded devices from time to time. Now if it's
    all in the past... that's just wrong.

    On 11 Feb 2014 10:14, "Christoph Pulster" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        ... thanks to Sharism, which did an aweful job cooperation
        with the
        resellers. I am really deeply disappointed.
        There is a ready to sell product, there is also customer
        demand (small,
        but anyway), and Sharism is ignoring the market.
        I have 3 units left in stock, after this the Nanonote is past.

        Christoph

        _______________________________________________
        Qi Hardware Discussion List
        Mail to list (members only):
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
        http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion


    _______________________________________________
    Qi Hardware Discussion List
    Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion




_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to