On 03/14/2015 02:10 PM, Werner Almesberger wrote: > hellekin wrote: >> On the other hand, the double discourse on >> open-core (free "community edition", proprietary "enterprise edition") >> is annoying. > > Yes, this makes me also a bit apprehensive about the long-term > perspective of their service. What if they decide some day that > providing public git repo hosting is no longer part of their > core business ? > > I see much less risk with GitHub in this regard.
Why not Savannah? The FSF seems even less likely to just shut down (or `change their business plan') anytime soon, and Qi Hardware seems *much* better aligned with the GNU project than with something like GitHub. Consider the welcome-message at the top of <http://sv.nongnu.org/>: Welcome to Savannah, the software forge for people committed to free software: * We host free projects that run on free operating systems and without any proprietary software dependencies. * Our service runs with 100% free software, including itself. * Why choose Savannah? <http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah/> Savannah.nongnu.org is a central point for development, maintenance and distribution of free software. -- "Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))." _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
