Joshua Judson Rosen wrote: > Why not Savannah? Ah, good old Savannah ! :)
> The FSF seems even less likely to just shut down > (or `change their business plan') Yes, I wouldn't worry about that. But then, using Savannah does seem to come with a good dose of FSF politics, and the FSF has fairly extreme ideas about what's "right" and what's "wrong" when it comes to making hardware. While these ideas may be quite reasonable when you consider the FSF's core assets (mainly the GPL as embodiment of the four freedoms, and the resulting cultural impact), they also clash with things that you run into when making even moderately complex hardware. Now, Anelok may in its current state actually pass all of FSF's criteria, but I wouldn't want to depend on being able to guarantee that this will be so forever, or have to argue about interpretations. So I'd prefer a place that's more relaxed about such things. - Werner _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
