On 3/16/15, Werner Almesberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Joshua Judson Rosen wrote: >> Why not Savannah? > > Ah, good old Savannah ! :) > >> The FSF seems even less likely to just shut down >> (or `change their business plan') > > Yes, I wouldn't worry about that. But then, using Savannah does seem > to come with a good dose of FSF politics, and the FSF has fairly > extreme ideas about what's "right" and what's "wrong" when it comes > to making hardware. > > While these ideas may be quite reasonable when you consider the > FSF's core assets (mainly the GPL as embodiment of the four freedoms, > and the resulting cultural impact), they also clash with things that > you run into when making even moderately complex hardware. > > Now, Anelok may in its current state actually pass all of FSF's > criteria, but I wouldn't want to depend on being able to guarantee > that this will be so forever, or have to argue about > interpretations.
Ah, you feel that you could be sentenced to death by hanging if you do not pass all the tests and criterias right? ;-) Rafa _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
