Nick,

You are right... Before I started fooling around, I removed
traffic shaping and suddenly my download was good to go. I
think I still need to do something useful with the Cisco,
but I think I need to really do some homework on the traffic
shaper. 

Does anyone have a pointer to where I can read up on
optimizing the traffic shaper? It would seem that the wizard
caused mucho problems.

K.


On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:34:10PM -0600, Nick Buraglie wrote:
>Just to clarify, I'm not trying to discourage but more to see if what  
>you want to do will actually solve your problem and not just be a lot  
>of work for little or no gain.
>
>
>nb
>
>
>On Feb 18, 2006, at 9:32 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote:
>
>>What are the issues you have with your ISP?  Are you sure they are  
>>related to routing?   I was the senior network engineer for a  
>>decent sized ISP for years and in my experience last mile problems  
>>are almost always relate to the telco and not [dynamic] routing.    
>>Why do you feel you need dynamic routing?  Do you have more than 1  
>>provider?
>>
>>nb
>>
>>
>>
>>On Feb 18, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, I have made the changes to the Cisco and I can now long
>>>in. So what do I need to do to A.) Allow pfsense to play
>>>nicely with the Cisco. B.) Since I don't know what routing
>>>protocol that the edge router is using, what do I need to do
>>>to setup the Cisco to dynamically route traffic?
>>>
>>>K.
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Abyss - 1 wrote:
>>>>Ok as for the password recovery there is a "easy" an non config  
>>>>deleting
>>>>way.
>>>>
>>>>On the cisco page there is a section for password recovery it  
>>>>outlines
>>>>all the staps needed to recover the password without deleting the
>>>>configuration !
>>>>You will need console access to the router though I have used it  
>>>>from
>>>>800 series till 10000 series routers so I know it works :)
>>>>
>>>>I will post the link later on I have to grab my laptop for it ;)
>>>>
>>>>J.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>>>>Here is the problem in a nutshell... The Cisco was bought
>>>>>and they had someone configure the Cisco. There was a
>>>>>falling out, and the guy bailed without giving the enable
>>>>>password on the Cisco.
>>>>>
>>>>>Although I could crack the password, all of the methods that
>>>>>I know usually blow away the configuration. And for whatever
>>>>>reason, they (the ISP) can get the configuration from the
>>>>>T-1 provider (probably because they have been lax in paying
>>>>>the bill).
>>>>>
>>>>>I agree that it would probably be better to use the cisco to
>>>>>handle the routing, but unless someone can tell me how to
>>>>>crack the enable password, that is not an option.
>>>>>
>>>>>K.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:24:59PM +0100, Abyss - 1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I guess you need Zebra then or gated dont know the one you are  
>>>>>>talking
>>>>>>about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But what kind of routing issues are you getting from the link  
>>>>>>from the
>>>>>>ISP as there might be a better solution resolved within the  
>>>>>>cisco as the
>>>>>>Linux routing packages are notoriously instable and unreliable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I work allot with checkpoint firewalls at work and they have  
>>>>>>the zebra
>>>>>>and gated solutions (depending on the version) and there are major
>>>>>>issues with the dynamic routing on those.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>J.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My issue is that my pfsense box is connected to a Cisco
>>>>>>>router which is acting as a bridge to connect to ISP. I am
>>>>>>>constantly running into problems with the way the ISP
>>>>>>>routes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If I were to install quagga on to the pfsense box, would the
>>>>>>>box actually handle the routing through RIP and dymanically
>>>>>>>change the routing tables thus bypassing the problems on the
>>>>>>>ISP side or is that wasted effort on my part?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>K.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 02:50:35PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There no GUIS for them and the packages never worked  
>>>>>>>>properly.   It is
>>>>>>>>possible to manually pkg_add -r quagga still.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 2/18/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I believe that once upon a time, one of the packages that
>>>>>>>>>was available was zebra/quagga. Has that package been
>>>>>>>>>removed or was that a figment of my imagination?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>K.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to