Nadav Har'El wrote: > > Maybe Shachar wasn't clear enough, so let me try to explain what he meant. > Sorry about the sarcasm in what follows. But I simply don't see how any > "compromise" can work as long as Shachar continues to hold his beliefs: > > Shachar believes that
> > Shachar doesn't believe > > Shachar believes that > > Shachar believes that > Shachar also believes that Nadav is neither authorized, nor even understands what Shachar thinks well enough, to speak for him. Shachar Third person is so great!!! _______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list Discussions@hamakor.org.il http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
