On 22 Jul 2003, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Martin Pool wrote: > > > 2.9 is out. Use of mmapped files and compression seems to make it > > measurably faster in at least some situations, so I encourage you to > > try upgrading. > > > > Thanks to everyone who sent bug reports, patches or success reports. > > I've made some new packages for distcc 2.9 and reviewed the > README.packaging. The last paragraph also refers to renaming the different > compilers and I was wondering if you could at least mention the naming > policy we discussed before, eg: > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-2.96 > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2 > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2.2
OK. > If the same convention is used on different platforms, distcc has a bigger > chance of working out of the box while compiling in mixed > environments. Yes. > I also noticed distcc ships with a Red Hat init-script now, but my > packages have an init-script embedded in the SPEC file along with some > other config files, that SPEC file is here: > > http://dag.wieers.com/packages/distcc/distcc.spec The one in CVS is just an example; I don't test it. The spec looks good. Perhaps you could add a comment to the xinetd file that it if it's on, the daemon should be turned off? You might put '--nice 5' in the default options. You might add examples of others as comments in the sysconfig file, in particular --jobs and --allow. > ftp://people.redhat.com/aoliva/rpms/9/i386/ OK. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
