On 23 Jul 2003, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I've made some new packages for distcc 2.9 and reviewed the > > > README.packaging. The last paragraph also refers to renaming the different > > > compilers and I was wondering if you could at least mention the naming > > > policy we discussed before, eg: > > > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-2.96 > > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2 > > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2.2 > > It's wrong to put "redhat" in the MANUFACTURER field of a triplet. > For Linux systems, permissible values are: axis, ibm, pc and > unknown.
I guess if Red Hat apply incompatible patches as apprently happened in 2.96, they ought to call it i386-unknown-linux-gcc-2.96rh or something? -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
