On 23 Jul 2003, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I've made some new packages for distcc 2.9 and reviewed the
> > > README.packaging. The last paragraph also refers to renaming the different
> > > compilers and I was wondering if you could at least mention the naming
> > > policy we discussed before, eg:
>
> > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-2.96
> > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2
> > > i386-redhat-linux-cc-3.2.2
>
> It's wrong to put "redhat" in the MANUFACTURER field of a triplet.
> For Linux systems, permissible values are: axis, ibm, pc and unknown.
Actually I took that scheme because the gcc RPM from Red Hat uses the
following path:
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/cc1
I personally think the 'redhat' is very important there. unknown would
clash with other compilers from other distros.
I don't know what specification you're referring to, but should distcc's
scheme have to follow that specification ?
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
__
distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
