On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Martin Pool wrote: > On 22 Jul 2003, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Martin Pool wrote: > > > I also noticed distcc ships with a Red Hat init-script now, but my > > packages have an init-script embedded in the SPEC file along with some > > other config files, that SPEC file is here: > > > > http://dag.wieers.com/packages/distcc/distcc.spec > > The one in CVS is just an example; I don't test it.
I understand, the reason I'm not using the provided scripts is because I'd like to have them obey the directories used by the build system/rpm. I could rewrite them, but it's easier to maintain if it is included. > The spec looks good. Perhaps you could add a comment to the xinetd > file that it if it's on, the daemon should be turned off? Exactly, I guess the infrastructure should have a possibility to have them both mutual exclusive. Maybe food for thought in a RH bugzilla entry ? > You might put '--nice 5' in the default options. You might add > examples of others as comments in the sysconfig file, in particular > --jobs and --allow. Yes, that's a good idea. If --nice 5 is a good default, why isn't it implied ? The next release will have the mentioned recommendations. Thank you very much. -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
