On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:24:10 -0400 Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > TOML is infinitely better at nested structured that ConfigParser, given that > TOML actually *supports* nested structures beyond a level of 1. The only way > to get anything like: > > [package.build] > dependencies = ["setuptools", "wheel"] > > In ConfigParser is to add post-processing to the values, which then you're no > longer a "ConfigParser" file, you're a "ConfigParser + Whatever random one off > code you wrote to do post processing" file.
The post-processing doesn't seem difficult enough to make any fuss about it, IMHO. The most important concern here should be how usable the format is for end users, not whether implementations need 20 additional lines of code to work with it. (also, what is wrong with providing a pypa-specific library for parsing required configuration? are distlib / distil / pkgutil / the distutils-competitor-du-jour still alive?) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
