On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 5:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > I don't know why you're having this experience of a classifier you think > used to be supported no longer being supported. You say the license field > is the same as on previous uploads. But the license field isn't the issue > here. Is the classifiers field also the same? > > I would hazard a guess that the previous upload of the package was done in > a way that didn't send the classifiers; there are none listed for it: > > https://pypi.org/project/pyRXP/2.1.0/ > > So the classifier was inside the package, but not sent with the request, > and thus PyPI ignored it. > And yet you can see "License: ReportLab BSD Derived" in the left-hand column under "Meta," so how did it get there? Did PyPI previously fall back to including the "License" classifier value as is (even if invalid) if no "license" field was present? Here's the project's setup(), which doesn't seem to have changed since 2013: https://bitbucket.org/rptlab/pyrxp/annotate/3cb1071c105a9c87b2e54306ece861e92a24f606/setup.py?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default --Chris
-- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/TRCU5OLSLPR22PTLQ4EWUNVOLET2PDG3/
