On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 5. Model-level validation (#6845). [...] > and i thought it's in the plan to have this in 1.0.....
It is, assuming it gets done. Last I check Honza was working on it, and if he's still interested I expect he'd be able to wrap it up. However, while it would suck to ship 1.0 without it, there's nothing about the API that has to be backwards-incompatible, and it's a potentially "dangerous" feature in that it could spawn a lot of work. So, if we can get there, great; if not, well, you've got a reason to look forward to 1.1 :) > so i wonder, that if the WSGI-conformance ticket is a must-have, then > why this isn't too... > > perhaps the WSGI-change is smaller... Exactly -- the WSGI change is very small, and actually done (see the latest patch on #295). It basically just needs to be applied. > anyway, would be great to have the how-can-we-help data > (liutenant/committer/etc) > published as soon as possible... Yup, that's the next step! Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
