Honza Král E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 107471613 Phone: +420 606 678585
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:32, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> "Maybe" features >> ---------------- >> > . > . > . >> >> 5. Model-level validation (#6845). > > hi, > > it always seems quite ugly, that you can create a model with invalid data, > and save it. so when you want to validate it's content, you have to hack > around > and create a form for it, etc... > > as far as i understand, this change is a backwards-incompatible change, > and also touches quite the basic parts of the whole > models/forms/validation system, > > and i thought it's in the plan to have this in 1.0..... > > so i wonder, that if the WSGI-conformance ticket is a must-have, then > why this isn't too... > > perhaps the WSGI-change is smaller... > > anyway, would be great to have the how-can-we-help data > (liutenant/committer/etc) > published as soon as possible... most of the tickets mentioned were assigned to someone. I am the one working on 6845 and the how-can-anybody-help is attached to the ticket: the missing parts: 1. *feedback* !! (works, does what everybody expects it to do, has all the options neede) 2. *documentation* and code clenup 3. tests (the existing tests were adapted, but more are needed) > > gabor > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
