El mar, 08-07-2008 a las 19:34 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick escribió: > I'll also note that that ticket has sort of weaved it's way up to "ready > for checkin" without too much participation from core developers and > it's a bit of a change.
Dunno who the anonymous user was, not me ;) I didn't move it back to accepted as all concerns raised for the ticket were solved (including you comment #13). > Since Adrian seems to be the one most interested in it, it's likely to be > him who will eventually address it, but whoever does it eventually, I'm not sure on that point, that interest was showed 1 year and a half ago (comment #1) and was more like a design decission. The last core dev to show up was.. you! ;) > I wouldn't be too surprised to see it bounced back for better design or > technical reasons (just playing the odds -- I haven't > read the ticket after a very early patch some time back). I assume the patch you talk about is the one you commented, the parameter name was changed accordingly. Also Adrian's comment about doing it a bit more pythonic was also addressed. The patch is there, waitting for comments, please raise any technical/design concerns you have so I can address them. Regards, Marc PS: I also don't expect that one to get in for 1.0, I keep it near #689 and #6735 ;) PS: Thanks for the comments on the ticket¡! -- http://www.marcfargas.com -- will be finished some day.
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
