> That seems reasonable to me, but I'll add the stipulation that any > design proposal must include a commitment to do the implementation, > and must include all of the admin's pages.
Why? Not all designers can do cross browser xhtml/css (html5?) or even django's template language, let alone the admin's unique template environment. I'm sure there are a number of CSS gurus in the community who can then take over, and if there isn't, I'm certain the Django Foundation could afford to hire one for a reasonable price. I think requiring implementation would reduce the quality of the submissions. If there is a competition (which I hope there is!), it would be good if the submissions were to a clear set of requirements; eg a graphical design in illustrator/inkscape format of: * Base template (branding, header, footer, layout etc) * Login box * Home page (list of apps and models) * Change list * Change detail * Random content, elements (change password, delete confirmation, object history, invalid setup, 404 etc) If backwards compatibility is required, add to that a list of elements required for each page, based on the existing templates. But then again, any radically new design can live alongside the old admin for a time, to allow people to keep their customisations. Cheers, Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
