On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Juan Luis Boya <[email protected]> wrote: > uWSGI + FastCGI: We should have nice docs about this.
as others have previously said, uWSGI isn't viable for everybody. is there any other pure-python fcgi-wsgi server with reasonable performance? i think several people like to use gunicorn for http-wsgi, if it (or something similar: flask? wep.py?, werkzeug?) supports fcgi, it could be the recommended fcgi solution. -- Javier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
