On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, Benjamin Scherrey <proteus...@gmail.com> wrote: >Number 84 sounds fine. #86 is just looking for trouble. You were wise in 84 >to keep it positive and not enumerate a list of "banned" behaviour. To have >86 be anything beyond providing a weapon to be used by anyone looking to be >"victimized" in order to silence those whom they disagree with, you would >have to absolutely list the behaviours you don't want to tolerate. Frankly >84 is about toleration and acceptance whereas 86 can do nothing but >increase intolerance ultimately.
The only change of substance in <https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/pull/86> is the addition of one sentence: In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may affect a person's ability to participate within them. which is the case already - this just makes it explicit. "May affect" give us plenty of scope for a measured and proportionate response - it may just mean we watch them more carefully. Daniele -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/20140907142424.1464951136%40mail.wservices.ch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
