Hello,

The default <select> widget is fine for configuration tables with no more than 
a few dozen values.

In my experience, I rarely encountered use cases for editing foreign keys to 
very large tables in the admin.

Readonly or autocomplete are good choices.

Best regards,

-- 
Aymeric.



> On 17 Oct 2018, at 17:59, Yo-Yo Ma <baxterstock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have yet to ever come across a situation where the default <select> field 
> is more useful than the raw ID field, pertaining foreign key fields in the 
> admin.
> 
> I have, however, personally witnessed a major publishing company bring their 
> production app servers to a halt (out of memory) due to Django attempting to 
> generate 2.5 million <option value="..."> tags for some dozen admins that 
> were all refreshing an admin changeview, wondering why it was taking so long 
> to load.
> 
> Another thing worth noting is that when the <select> is most useful (when 
> there are very few records to select) also happens to be when the raw ID 
> field is most easily used (since the selection changelist only contains the 
> same very few records). IOW, the raw ID field's usefulness is universal, 
> working well with just a few records, and also working well (due to search / 
> sort) when there are many records.
> 
> Nary a transition would be required, since the `raw_id_fields` could simply 
> be ignored.
> 
> A new `select_fields = []` could be added for those who wish to easily  use 
> the old functionality.
> 
> Is there any reason why this couldn't or shouldn't be done?
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:django-developers@googlegroups.com>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/76e35c9d-b62f-498f-a382-6f12f74ebd98%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/76e35c9d-b62f-498f-a382-6f12f74ebd98%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/BF6BF10C-BFCE-47FE-A492-EF5B671E1039%40polytechnique.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • M... Yo-Yo Ma
    • ... Yo-Yo Ma
      • ... Collin Anderson
    • ... Aymeric Augustin
      • ... 'Ivan Anishchuk' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
        • ... Aymeric Augustin

Reply via email to