Thanks for the report! On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Steve Revilak wrote: > How are things working out with dkim-filter 2.4.2 and openssl 0.9.8b? > Better, but with hiccups. >[...] > Between the two mailings, the only real difference is message size. > In mailing #1 (crashes), we had multipart/alertnative messages of > around 51K. In mailing #2 (no crashes), we had multipart/alternative > messages of around 5k.
v2.4.3 (now in Beta) does contain a fix that has to do with the use of the rfc2822_mailbox_split() function on 64-bit systems. However, this is called the same number of times on each message regardless of message size so it doesn't obviously explain the symptoms you reported. > I'll try to develop a test case that reproduces the crash, and if I > can get a stack trace, I'll post it. I'll be happy to look at them when they're available, and including a sample message that causes the problem would be even better. If necessary I might be able to get a 64-bit CentOS 5 machine built in the lab where I can run it through the debugger. Thanks again! -MSK ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
