> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of McDowell, Brett > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:51 AM > To: MH Michael Hammer (5304) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying > "discardable") > > > The general rule would be to use a different domain that is > > far enough from the transactional/brand domain that the risk of use for > > enduser phishing is mitigated. > > Does everyone agree that this is the "best practice" for the use case > provided (ignoring I only gave you two namespace options)?
It certainly is an option, and it would certainly work. But personally, I reserve use of the words "best practice" for things that have been shown to work better than all other options. I don't know that that's been measured yet. _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
