> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Douglas Otis > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying > "discardable") > > On 9/9/10 9:51 AM, McDowell, Brett wrote: > > Does everyone agree that this is the "best practice" for the use case > > provided (ignoring I only gave you two namespace options)? > > Until more comprehensive policy becomes available, yes. > > In general, using a cousin domain is a bad practice, where the term > "far" has not been met by your current practice. [...]
Are there any recorded data supporting that assertion? _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
