> -----Original Message----- > From: MH Michael Hammer (5304) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:09 PM > To: McDowell, Brett; Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was > subdomain vs. cousin domain) > > There is actually another approach besides what you indicate above. A > domain can delegate a domain or subdomain to the 3rd party and let them > generate the keys and signature.
Yes, that's true. But both methods effectively make the third-party signer a part of the same domain as far as DKIM goes, inasmuch as the delegation is transparent to the verifier. So, in the end, they look identical. _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
