On 7/6/12 6:19 AM, "Chris Lamont Mankowski" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Does ADSP proessing, weight-based huristics, and -all *always* get
>overridden.. even when a DMARC record is discovered with a p=none?
>
>Does it matter what the value of pct is?
>
>To eliminate confusion, I think the following paragraph should be
>edited to read:
>
>Section 7, Policy Enforcement Considerations
>
> [Old]
> DMARC-compliant Mail Receivers MUST disregard any mail directive
> discovered as part of an authentication mechanism (e.g., ADSP, SPF)
> where a DMARC policy is also discovered. {R7}
>
> [Revised]
> DMARC-compliant Mail Receivers MUST disregard any mail directive
> discovered as part of an authentication mechanism (e.g., ADSP, SPF)
> where a DMARC policy is also discovered EXCEPT when "p=none" and
>"pct=" is
> missing or has any value. If the "p=" is equal to quarantine, reject,
>monitor,
> then only specified percentage of messages defined in "pct=" will have
>DMARC
> policy applied. (note that a missing pct= value implies 100%) {R7}
>
>Thoughts?
I'm not sure about this. A "none" means the Domain Owner is making an
explicit statement that it wants no action to be taken.
What's the particular use case you're trying to solve for here?
-MSK
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
