On 7/6/12 8:01 AM, "Chris Lamont Mankowski" <[email protected]> wrote: >The second use case that I'm trying to address is when a sender only >wants to receive feedback reports on message disposition and not alter >email processing in any way. I don't want a DMARC p=none to alter >anything the SPF is doing (-all or ~all). I also don't want DMARC to >alter processing of and ADSP record if present. >
Right, I think this point means that text you cited needs review. -MSK > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
