>>This assumes that the final disposition of the message in DMARC >>processing is different that SPF (which is more heuristic based)
Disregarding the bit about heuristic (SPF has its faults, but a lack of a clear algorithm is not one of them), I suspect the IETF would be not be thrilled if DMARC said that the result of SPF is one thing if you happen to look at DMARC records, and something else if you do. Keeping in mind that assertions you make can only decrease the reputation of a message, not increase it, I don't see any reason to tell people to do anything with SPF or DKIM other than they do now. If they quarantine or reject on SPF -all, or whitelist on SPF pass from a known sender that's fine. If they whitelist on a valid DKIM signature from a known sender, that's also fine. If they don't do any of those, then DMARC can offer some advice. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
