Yes, this is a change. The reason that the draft spec said zip compression was that there was a MIME type for zip but not for gzip. That was an oversight which I fixed with RFC 6713 which defines application/gzip.
gzip is technically better, since it can be compressed and decompressed incrementally as a stream, while zip requires storing the whole file before you can decode anything. It's an interesting question who supports gzip. My report processor doesn't yet, but I'll fix it this week. It's a pretty simple change. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
