On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/microsoft.com
>>> indeed...
>> 
>> wonder if its not possible with v=spf1 ptr mx a +all for a good start ?
>> 
>> what does "Network objects should not contain host bits" mean while we
>> are at it ?
>> 
> 
> It seems to me that dmarcian tells us that 207.68.169.173/30 is wrong,
> while 207.68.169.172/30 is correct cidr notation. It doesn't complain
> about correct cidr notations like 157.55.0.192/26.

The "Network objects should not contain host bits" is a warning that comes from 
the underlying library used to validate IP addresses and IP networks.  Since 
the SPF RFC describes this as being either an address or a network, a warning 
is surfaced for oddly-formed network expressions.

If I'm reading this too narrowly, by all means, please let me know!  I'm happy 
to suppress this the information is unnecessary (as perhaps the receiving 
world's SPF stacks simply don't care).

=- Tim


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to