On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 04:15:25 PM Murray Kucherawy wrote: > On 6/12/13 6:41 AM, "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >There are implementations that care, so you are right to raise the > >warning. > > Isn't that a bug? In terms of network matching, wouldn't you > ignore/discard the host bits?
Yes, but since such bugs exist, it's prudent not to publish SPF records with host bits set. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
