On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:07 PM, "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:dmarc-discuss-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Benny Pedersen
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:54 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail
>> 
>> Tim Draegen skrev den 2013-06-12 15:26:
>> 
>>> If I'm reading this too narrowly, by all means, please let me know!
>>> I'm happy to suppress this the information is unnecessary (as perhaps
>>> the receiving world's SPF stacks simply don't care).
>> 
>> i think it just need to be dokumented more what it means, worlds best spf
>> start record is v=spf1 mx +all, if it fails somewhere it can be seen in 
>> recipiens
>> mta, but it does not hurt anyone, another way of solving would be turn there
>> outgoin mta ips down, i bet thay dont have 80000 + mailsserver, even if thay
>> have it just need one outgoing ip
>> 
> 
> v=spf1 mx +all is absolutely NOT the worlds best spf start record. Publish 
> that and you are claiming that any mail sent from anywhere is yours - 
> including any spam, phishing, malware laden badness that uses your domain. 
> This is what's called putting a "kick me" sign on your back.
> 

I have seen before:
v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/1 ip4:128.0.0.0/1 -all


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to