On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tom Hendrikx skrev den 2013-06-12 11:45: > > > It seems to me that dmarcian tells us that 207.68.169.173/30 is wrong, >> while 207.68.169.172/30 is correct cidr notation. It doesn't complain >> about correct cidr notations like 157.55.0.192/26. >> > > so in other words: > > 127.0.2.0/24 > 127.0.0.0/8 > > gives the same error in spf ? > > Those are valid CIDR notation. 127.0.0.1/8, 127.0.10.0/8 and 127.0.2.10/24are not. -- David Romerstein | LivingSocial | Lead Engineer - MTA Operations | www.livingsocial.com
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
