>This is an important point. Popular free filtering programs like >Spamassassin can be easily altered to take DMARC results into account as >input to the overall filtering decision. It's equally easy to add >exemptions for certain sources. The notion that applying DMARC in >non-absolute ways is out of the reach of the masses seems plainly false to >me.
Spamassassin already has some rules that do special case DKIM and SPF handling for paypal, ebay, and other heavily phished domains whose mail reliably passes DKIM or SPF. (It's in 60_whitelist*.cf and 60_adsp_override_dkim.cf.) Since they already have those, I have to say at this point it's not obvious that adding DMARC to the mix would make the filtering much better. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
