On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm a little baffled by people making generalities, about me, personally, > testing mailing lists (and especially most of the dmarc related lists) with > p=reject, and people assuming a generality from this.
It’s kind of a domain reputation issue. That you’re using an @linkedin.com email address for 1:1 email to mailing lists shows that linkedin.com are not an appropriate domain to use DMARC as they don’t have full control over how their domain is used for email (and that in turn leads to more pressure to special case delivery and ignore DMARC unless you know something more about the mail and so on). That you’re doing this on mailing lists that have a high visibility to DMARC folks means that the impact of that is *way* disproportionally large. :) If you were to use a different domain for your testing of mailing list behaviour with DMARC (e.g. franckmartin.com or an entirely DMARC testing dedicated one) then the implication would be quite different. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
