On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> My question was rather carefully formed. The intent, one assumes, of this list, is to examine and discuss operational issues that relate to DMARC. It seems as though the existence of a bug is being inferred; the archives don't reflect what recipients receive, I read. But in what way? The problem statement is going unstated, unclarified. It is, to borrow a phrase, not rather carefully formed. Here's a possible way to start: I think the web archive of this mailing list does not reflect what recipients received because it __________________. I think that is bad because ____________________. Do you think the web archive doesn't reflect what email subscribing recipients received? In what way, specifically? Is it material, and is it harmful? Regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson | Chicago, IL | (312) 725-0130 Twitter: @aliverson / www.spamresource.com _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
