On 5/11/2014 2:22 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote: > The intent, one assumes, of this list, is to examine and discuss > operational issues that relate to DMARC. It seems as though the > existence of a bug is being inferred; the archives don't reflect what > recipients receive, I read. But in what way? The problem statement is > going unstated, unclarified. It is, to borrow a phrase, not rather > carefully formed.
Nice job, Al. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Question_dodging Bullet's 8 and 9 diligently applied. Although it does prompt the question of why you are working so hard to avoid responding to the substance of the question I asked. And no, I'm not expecting a useful response. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
