On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Hector Santos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It is more easier, more feasible, more safe, to just reject/discard >>> the failed message (due to policy) at the backend and be done with it. >>> >> >> In your opinion. >> > > It is the expert opinion of million of IETF-MAN-HOURS and SMTP systems > that have long implemented and deployed 4yz/5yz client/server response > system and state machine. That includes my expert opinion. Its the expert > opinion of systems that have deployed strong system level rejection > methods, among them SPF, DNSRBL and now DMARC. I understand you are a > LSP. DMARC effects you differently, but we can't throw out the proverbial > baby. That's colorful, but not automatically true. There's plenty of other expert opinion (and, to date, consensus) to suggest that it's not a universal truth. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
