----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Crocker" <[email protected]> > To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>, "Franck Martin" > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:06:13 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-00.txt > > On 6/10/2014 4:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Assuming by "strong DKIM signature" you mean the originator signature > > that covers the whole message, then given the MLM is going to invalidate > > it, it basically doesn't exist. > > > If it happens to survive (such as to recpients of the original message > who are not on a mailing list, so they get a direct copy) then their > DKIM evaluation engine ought to pay attention to the 'strength' of the > different signatures.
Yes, but it requires change in the deployed DKIM base, may be best to put these changes within DMARC, while there are still some motivated coordinated developers. > > Also note that the weaker signature is enabled by the DKIM-Delegate > field, which specifies what intermediaries are tolerated. > ah, yes... _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
