On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> ------------------------------ > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is interesting, however it seems to me that DMARC should be more >> aware of it if used. >> > > Why? This is a way of satisfying the alignment requirement on the DKIM > side. DMARC doesn't need to know it's there. The same is true of ATPS, > for example. > > > Sure but you have a strong DKIM signature and a weak DKIM signature, using > about the same domain, it is like the strong DKIM signature did not > exist... > Assuming by "strong DKIM signature" you mean the originator signature that covers the whole message, then given the MLM is going to invalidate it, it basically doesn't exist. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
