I'm not sure I can completely characterize that problem, but it's something
along the times of there need to be some way to state the intention behind
this particular signature. Is this a signature tied to use by third parties?
Whitelisting? Something else?
What about a new canonicalization, which is largely the same as the
existing ones but carries with it the additional semantic that "This can
only pass when accompanied by a Mediator signature"?
That would work, but it seems more kludgy than usual to tie the new loose
canonicalization to the second signature. Those are both features that
seem like they could be useful on their own.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
