John R Levine writes: > > And humor aside, please state the technical changes to the existing DKIM > > specification that are being made with DKIM-Delegate. > > If a signature has an rsf= tag, verifiers ignore it unless there's a > matching signature from a domain the rsf= points to. > > This is not backward compatible, since verifiers that don't understand > rsf= will often get the wrong answer, so it needs a version bump.
Can't both the version bump issue and the token signature issue be ameliorated by incorporating the token signature in the DKIM-Delegate field? There's a protocol collision on the t= tag which would need to be addressed, but otherwise I don't see a problem. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
