On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can't both the version bump issue and the token signature issue be > ameliorated by incorporating the token signature in the DKIM-Delegate > field? > > There's a protocol collision on the t= tag which would need to be > addressed, but otherwise I don't see a problem. > > Interesting. So DKIM-Delegate is syntactically the same as DKIM-Signature, but with augmented semantics? Or did you have something else in mind? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
