On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:59 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> In practice, until something better shows up everyone downloads and >>> uses Mozilla's PSL. It's a crock, but it's what people use. >> >> But I can't see IETF publishing a standards-track specification that >> uses the PSL, or anything like that. > > The current DMARC spec just waves its hands and says use something like the > PSL without specifically pointing at the PSL. We've done worse. > > Having said that, it is not my impression that producing a standards track > DMARC-bis is a goal of this group. Dear John, It seems one solution for the PSL would be to cull out domains not directly assigned by a registrar recognized by the global Internet. It may mean some domain holders will then be unable to control their domain. They never did. Such a change may motivate those holders to seek a safer name basis. Regards, Douglas Otis _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
