On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Agreed again. And as Terry has said and I think we can infer about > > other large operators, it's incorrect to assume (and plain wrong to > > assert) that this is an easy problem for them to solve in a > > reliable way. > > Please define "reliable." I gather you all think that missing some > mailing lists is a bigger problem than missing all of them, but for > the life of me, I cannot see why. > I'm having trouble coming up with a heuristic that is even certain to grab "most" of them. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
