On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:50 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In the diff I sent in, I also proposed header.s (selector). I think >> that's >> important for troubleshooting. Is there a reason you left it out? I can >> do >> another draft for it, if you want, but it seems like a lot of process >> overhead >> for not very much more. >> > > It's in the base ARC draft. Does it matter which document does it? > > -MSK > We had talked about putting the definitions into 7601bis because that doc is standards track (so presumably more enduring) than the "experimental" ARC spec. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
