In article <CAL0qLwZLW9DT+nyWFoLHZaXivzspx=s7-GMKOhd9=rB=vmm...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >This includes a registration for "header.a" and John's changes to support >EAI. However, Barry has some concerns with how "local-part" is not left in >a good state by these changes. Those of you in the WG with clue about EAI, >please help me sort this out, since I do not fall into that category.
That would probably be me, but I don't know what the local-part problem is. My intention was to import the local-part changes from the EAI RFC. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
