On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:47 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <CAL0qLwZLW9DT+nyWFoLHZaXivzspx=s7-GMKOhd9=rB= > [email protected]> you write: > >This includes a registration for "header.a" and John's changes to support > >EAI. However, Barry has some concerns with how "local-part" is not left > in > >a good state by these changes. Those of you in the WG with clue about > EAI, > >please help me sort this out, since I do not fall into that category. > > That would probably be me, but I don't know what the local-part > problem is. My intention was to import the local-part changes from > the EAI RFC. The problem has to do with the ambiguity that is being imported along with those local-part ABNF changes. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
