On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the diff I sent in, I also proposed header.s (selector). I think that's > >> important for troubleshooting. Is there a reason you left it out? I can >>> do >>> another draft for it, if you want, but it seems like a lot of process >>> overhead >>> for not very much more. >>> >> >> It's in the base ARC draft. Does it matter which document does it? >> > > We had talked about putting the definitions into 7601bis because that doc > is standards track (so presumably more enduring) than the "experimental" > ARC spec. > Ah, OK. I don't mind which one has it, but I do want to avoid duplicating effort. So I'm fine with either. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
