I think _dmarc as a TXT record is fairly well known. Is there anything that would specifically prohibit this?
Mike From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luis E. Muñoz Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 1:51 PM To: Peter M. Goldstein Cc: dmarc; Kurt Andersen Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] inheritance and public suffix list On 4 Apr 2018, at 11:19, Peter M. Goldstein wrote: 3. *New gTLDs* - With the recent expansion of the list of TLDs, many of the new TLDs are controlled by a single organization. It may make sense to allow those gTLDs to define a DMARC record on the TLD itself or on some 'default' domain - both for administrative simplification and to ensure against abuse. It may be possible to handle this case outside of a lookup change with wildcarded DNS records, but I know it's something that's come up in discussions with some of those TLD owners. Keep in mind that gTLD operators are restricted in the records they can include in their respective DNS zones. This would require the use of a well known name specifically for this purpose. Best regards Luis Muñoz Director, Registry Operations ________________________________ http://www.uniregistry.link/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.uniregistry.link_&d=DwMFaQ&c=x7B6bjj-lbW7-A5duSwtVZBwdPVsIEJbxl96ul0HiXQ&r=Jb3AiMhkpw4bVAHnghD5VA&m=-tBem26AjT5N4-O1DbHfhq51zJqAv0EDsKdUwHbm7LQ&s=j88Q0-8mw50P1w-IenC0ZYww-HjK1CcHxKlYPvMeI2I&e=> 2161 San Joaquin Hills Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
